Less Costly Insurance Urged for ‘As Is’ Buys
- Share via
Mike Teverbaugh’s article on disclosure problems (May 25) prompted the thought that brokers could find a market for many homes by offering discount prices to buyers willing to accept homes “as is” and “with all faults,” if insurance companies offered “pig-in-a-poke” policies at attractive rates to allow the homeowner to insure to replacement value for hidden defects.
It stands to reason that a buyer who wants protection should pay for it, and buyers willing to settle for less--the “fixer-uppers”--should not have to pay for protection against defects they prefer to correct themselves.
Obviously, insurance companies can offer better rates to the individual buyer, since the broker is a “deep pocket” risk, and the buyer is not. The availability of low-cost “structural defect” insurance would protect the buyer, while discount prices would make homes more attractive to first-time buyers.
The only losers would be contingency fee lawyers, and they’re all so rich they’ll never notice the difference.
JAMES F. GLADKIN
Pasadena
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
