IRVINE : Tab for Failed Tax Measure Is $51,250
- Share via
Campaigners spent $51,250 in an unsuccessful attempt to pass a temporary property tax measure in the Irvine Unified School District.
The campaign for Measure P, which was on the June 4 ballot in Irvine, spent most of its money on mailers, while a substantial amount also went to a political consulting firm that helped direct the campaign. The mailers and postage cost $23,471; the consultant’s fee was $20,000.
The information is detailed in state-required spending reports filed with the county registrar of voters. The final report outlining final campaign spending was due Wednesday. The campaign group, called Partnership in Irvine Education--Yes on Measure P, was headed by school board member Mary Ellen Hadley, who promised to run a vigorous campaign in support of the measure. The tax would have raised about $1.4 million a year and would have helped make up for an estimated $3-million shortfall expected next school year.
Measure P lost by 369 votes.
School district officials blamed the defeat on a last-minute flyer that was handed out door-to-door by members of the Greater Irvine Republican Assembly. The Irvine-based conservative political group opposed the tax and wanted the school district to stay within budget constraints, according to the group’s president, Bruce E. Peotter.
On the fund-raising side, the Measure P campaign had $51,817 in contributions and a $13,500 bank loan.
The largest contribution was $7,500 from the Irvine Co. Several other developers, as well as companies and individuals involved in real estate, also donated large sums, often up to $1,000.
Education-oriented unions also gave generously. A $5,000 contribution came from a group called District Advisory Forum IUSD, $2,000 came from the Irvine Administrators Assn. and $1,000 was sent by the Irvine Teachers Assn.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.